"Yours is Better" Participant Bias in HCI

Posted by AnneryanHeatwole on Jan 20, 2012
Author: 
Nicola Dell, Vidya Vaidyanathan, Indrani Medhi, Edward Cutrell, William Thies
Publication Type: 
Report/White paper
Publication Date: 
May 2012
Publication language: 
English
Abstract: 

Although HCI [human computer interaction] researchers and practitioners frequently work with groups of people that differ significantly from themselves, little attention has been paid to the effects these differences have on the evaluation of HCI systems. Via 450 interviews in Bangalore, India, we measure participant response bias due to interviewer demand characteristics and the role of social and demographic factors in influencing that bias. We find that respondents are about 2.5x more likely to prefer a technological artifact they believe to be developed by the interviewer, even when the alternative is identical.

When the interviewer is a foreign researcher requiring a translator, the bias towards the interviewer’s artifact increases to 5x. In fact, the interviewer’s artifact is preferred even when it is degraded to be obviously inferior to the alternative.

We conclude that participant response bias should receive more attention within the CHI community, especially when designing for underprivileged populations.

Countries: 
Featured?: 
No
"Yours is Better" Participant Bias in HCI data sheet 623 Views
Author: 
Nicola Dell, Vidya Vaidyanathan, Indrani Medhi, Edward Cutrell, William Thies
Publication Type: 
Report/White paper
Publication Date: 
May 2012
Publication language: 
English
Abstract: 

Although HCI [human computer interaction] researchers and practitioners frequently work with groups of people that differ significantly from themselves, little attention has been paid to the effects these differences have on the evaluation of HCI systems. Via 450 interviews in Bangalore, India, we measure participant response bias due to interviewer demand characteristics and the role of social and demographic factors in influencing that bias. We find that respondents are about 2.5x more likely to prefer a technological artifact they believe to be developed by the interviewer, even when the alternative is identical.

When the interviewer is a foreign researcher requiring a translator, the bias towards the interviewer’s artifact increases to 5x. In fact, the interviewer’s artifact is preferred even when it is degraded to be obviously inferior to the alternative.

We conclude that participant response bias should receive more attention within the CHI community, especially when designing for underprivileged populations.

Countries: 
Featured?: 
No

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><p><br> <b><i><blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options